May 26, 2026
SF Examiner Recommends NO on Prop B, Skewers Proponent for Holding Two Seats at Once
San Francisco Examiner Editorial Board
The SF Examiner recommends a no vote on Prop B, arguing the measure is "more political theater than policy." The board pointedly notes that the supervisor who introduced the measure currently holds two elected seats simultaneously — one on the Board of Supervisors and another on the Democratic County Central Committee — making his stated concern about over-representation of individuals "feel fatuous at best." The Examiner concludes that voters, not incumbent politicians, should retain the right to choose their leaders.
Read Full Editorial →
May 2026
Bay Area Reporter: "A Ridiculous Ballot Measure" — Vote NO on Prop B
Bay Area Reporter
The Bay Area Reporter endorses a NO vote, calling Prop B "a ridiculous ballot measure" and "a solution in search of a problem." The editorial argues it is up to San Francisco voters to elect whom they want as supervisor or mayor, and that lifetime bans on politicians are extremely rare — with 71% of America's most populous cities with term limits having no lifetime ban. "Voters have enough issues to deal with, such as affordability and public safety," the editorial concludes. "Vote No on Prop B."
Read Full Editorial →
May 6, 2026
Bay Guardian: "NO, NO, NO" — A Ridiculous Solution in Search of a Problem
San Francisco Bay Guardian
The Bay Guardian delivers an emphatic triple NO on Prop B, calling it "a ridiculous solution in search of a problem." The editorial argues that this has simply not been a problem in San Francisco politics, that experience matters, and that the measure takes control away from voters. On term limits for legislators, the Guardian is blunt: "Term limits for executives make sense; term limits for legislators are almost always a bad idea." Its conclusion: "Under the ranked-choice district system, we already have term limits: They're called elections."
Read Full Endorsements →
May 4, 2026
Jerry Brown Compares San Francisco's Prop B to Trump, Putin
Mission Local
In a detailed interview with Mission Local, former Governor Jerry Brown expands on his opposition to Proposition B, comparing the measure's antidemocratic nature to authoritarian tactics used by Trump and Putin. Brown argues that preventing voters from choosing experienced leaders if they wish is fundamentally undemocratic and runs counter to San Francisco's progressive values.
Read Full Article →
May 8, 2026
League of Women Voters San Francisco Opposes Prop B
League of Women Voters San Francisco
The League of Women Voters San Francisco has announced its opposition to Proposition B, stating that the measure "permanently disqualifies diverse, experienced leaders from serving our communities." The League, a nonpartisan organization dedicated to encouraging informed and active participation in government, argues that the lifetime ban is too extreme and removes voter choice.
Read Full Recommendation →
May 8, 2026
Sing Tao Daily Opposes Lifetime Term Limit Ban
Sing Tao Daily
Sing Tao Daily, a leading Chinese-language newspaper serving the San Francisco Bay Area, has come out against Proposition B's lifetime term limit ban. The editorial board argues that voters should retain the right to choose experienced leaders if they wish, and that the measure solves a problem that doesn't exist in San Francisco politics.
Read Full Editorial →
April 20, 2026
San Francisco Chronicle Recommends NO on Prop B
San Francisco Chronicle Editorial Board
The San Francisco Chronicle Editorial Board recommends voting NO on Proposition B, stating "Insider politics, not effective governance" drives this measure. The editorial argues that the lifetime term limit ban is unnecessary and anti-democratic, pointing out that only one San Francisco leader has ever returned to office after the required break.
Read Full Editorial →
January 26, 2026
Jerry Brown Calls San Francisco Term-Limit Measure "Trumpian"
San Francisco Standard
Former California Governor Jerry Brown is condemning a proposed San Francisco ballot measure that would impose lifetime term limits on city supervisors and mayors, calling it "Trumpian" and anti-democratic. Brown, who served as California's youngest and oldest governor across non-consecutive terms, argues the measure would strip voters of their right to choose experienced leaders.
Read Full Article →
December 17, 2025
Former San Francisco Mayors Oppose Lifetime Term Limits Ban
San Francisco Chronicle
Former Mayors Willie Brown and Art Agnos join Governor Jerry Brown in opposing Proposition B, arguing that lifetime term limits are extreme and undemocratic. In an op-ed, they write that San Francisco voters should have the right to choose experienced leaders if they wish, and that only one leader has ever returned to serve after the required break in the city's modern history.
Read Full Article →
January 2026
Old Voter Intent Focus of Prop B's Lifetime Term Limits
San Francisco Examiner
The debate over Proposition B centers on conflicting interpretations of what San Francisco voters intended when they approved term limits in 1990. Opponents argue the measure goes far beyond the original intent and solves a problem that doesn't exist, noting that only one city leader has ever returned to office after the required four-year break.
Read Full Article →